back

Bitcoin Transactions Need 2 Hours to Be Safe, Says Developer

June 13, 2024
Bitcoin
6 min

If someone asked you how many blocks (or minutes) they should wait to ensure their Bitcoin (BTC) transaction is irreversible, would you know what to say? While the common rule of thumb is to wait between three to six blocks (around 30 to 60 minutes), experts suggest a more cautious approach. According to Bitcoin Core developer Luke Dash Jr., a 12-block waiting period (approximately 120 minutes) is now considered safer given the current state of Bitcoin mining. This recommendation stems from the probabilistic finality of Bitcoin transactions, where each new block added to the blockchain increases the irreversibility of the transactions it contains.

Understanding Bitcoin's Probabilistic Finality

Bitcoin transactions are not immediately irreversible. Instead, they achieve what is known as "probabilistic finality." This means that the likelihood of a transaction being reversed decreases with each additional block that is added to the blockchain after the block containing the transaction.

How Bitcoin Transactions Work

When someone sends BTC from one address to another, such as depositing BTC to a centralized exchange to sell, the transaction initially sits in a mempool. The mempool is a waiting area for transactions that have yet to be included in a block. Miners then select transactions from the mempool to include in the next block they mine. Once a miner successfully mines a block, it is broadcasted to the network and added to the blockchain.

However, if another miner with more computational power (hashrate) mines a block at the same height, the first block could be invalidated. Bitcoin nodes always follow the chain with the highest cumulative work, meaning the chain with the most computational effort behind it. Each subsequent block added to the chain increases the work put into that chain, making it progressively harder to invalidate.

The Importance of Confirmation Time

The confirmation time for a Bitcoin transaction is crucial for ensuring its irreversibility. According to Jameson Lopp, a renowned Bitcoin contributor, the required confirmation time for a 99.9% certainty of irreversibility varies depending on the percentage of the network's hashrate controlled by a potential attacker. For instance, if an attacker controls 10% of the hashrate, five blocks (approximately 50 minutes) may be sufficient. However, if the attacker controls 45% of the hashrate, it could take up to 340 blocks (over 56 hours) to achieve the same level of certainty.

Current State of Bitcoin Mining

Luke Dash Jr.'s recommendation of a 12-block waiting period aligns with the current state of Bitcoin mining. Two major mining pools, Foundry USA and Antpool, control a significant portion of the global hashrate, with 29.67% and 22.75%, respectively. This concentration of mining power increases the risk of a 51% attack, where a single entity or group controls more than half of the network's hashrate, potentially allowing them to reverse transactions.

Mining Pool Concentration

The concentration of mining power in a few large pools makes the network more vulnerable to attacks. As of the last month, Foundry USA and Antpool together control over 50% of the total hashrate. This centralization poses a risk to the network's security and underscores the need for longer confirmation times to ensure transaction irreversibility.

Varying Confirmation Requirements

The recommended waiting time for Bitcoin transactions can vary depending on the state of the network and the risk tolerance of the receiving party. Some centralized exchanges may choose to wait for three blocks for smaller deposits, while others may require four, five, or even six blocks for larger amounts. Each block has an average interval of 10 minutes, so the total waiting time can range from 30 to 60 minutes or more.

Risk Tolerance and Transaction Size

The level of risk tolerance and the size of the transaction play a significant role in determining the required confirmation time. For high-value transactions, waiting for more confirmations reduces the risk of double-spending attacks. Conversely, for smaller transactions, fewer confirmations may be acceptable.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the traditional rule of thumb for Bitcoin transaction confirmation times ranges from three to six blocks, experts like Luke Dash Jr. recommend a more cautious approach of 12 blocks, or approximately 120 minutes. This recommendation takes into account the current state of Bitcoin mining and the concentration of hashrate in a few large pools. By understanding the probabilistic finality of Bitcoin transactions and the factors that influence confirmation times, users can make more informed decisions to ensure the security and irreversibility of their transactions.

Additional Considerations

As the Bitcoin network continues to evolve, it is essential to stay informed about changes in mining power distribution and network security. Users should regularly review best practices for transaction confirmation times and adjust their strategies accordingly. By doing so, they can minimize the risk of transaction reversals and ensure the integrity of their Bitcoin holdings.

Future Developments

Looking ahead, advancements in Bitcoin technology and potential changes in mining dynamics may impact recommended confirmation times. Innovations such as the Lightning Network aim to provide faster and more efficient transaction processing, potentially reducing the need for extended confirmation periods. However, until such solutions are widely adopted and proven secure, adhering to conservative confirmation practices remains prudent.

Final Thoughts

Ultimately, the safety of Bitcoin transactions depends on a combination of factors, including network hashrate distribution, transaction size, and individual risk tolerance. By understanding these elements and following expert recommendations, users can enhance the security of their Bitcoin transactions and contribute to the overall stability of the network.


Related Articles

Why is Bitcoin Up This Week?

Explore the factors driving Bitcoin's recent price surge and what it means for investors.

R. Kiyosaki Says Bitcoin is a Bargain Today, Not Tomorrow, as ‘America is Broke’

Discover why financial expert Robert Kiyosaki believes Bitcoin is a valuable investment in the current economic climate.

Bitcoin vs BTC Mining Stocks: Which Had Higher Weekly Gains?

Compare the performance of Bitcoin and BTC mining stocks to determine which investment offers better returns.

Top 10 Bitcoin Holders Globally in September 2023

Find out who the largest Bitcoin holders are and how their holdings impact the market.

Each Taxpayer Would Need to Pay 10 BTC to Get Even with the US National Debt

Understand the scale of the US national debt and its implications for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.


By incorporating these additional SEO keywords and related articles, this rewritten article aims to attract more user traffic from search engines while providing valuable insights into Bitcoin transaction confirmation times and network security.

Share this article
contest

If someone asked you how many blocks (or minutes) they should wait to ensure their Bitcoin (BTC) transaction is irreversible, would you know what to say? While the common rule of thumb is to wait between three to six blocks (around 30 to 60 minutes), experts suggest a more cautious approach. According to Bitcoin Core developer Luke Dash Jr., a 12-block waiting period (approximately 120 minutes) is now considered safer given the current state of Bitcoin mining. This recommendation stems from the probabilistic finality of Bitcoin transactions, where each new block added to the blockchain increases the irreversibility of the transactions it contains.

Understanding Bitcoin's Probabilistic Finality

Bitcoin transactions are not immediately irreversible. Instead, they achieve what is known as "probabilistic finality." This means that the likelihood of a transaction being reversed decreases with each additional block that is added to the blockchain after the block containing the transaction.

How Bitcoin Transactions Work

When someone sends BTC from one address to another, such as depositing BTC to a centralized exchange to sell, the transaction initially sits in a mempool. The mempool is a waiting area for transactions that have yet to be included in a block. Miners then select transactions from the mempool to include in the next block they mine. Once a miner successfully mines a block, it is broadcasted to the network and added to the blockchain.

However, if another miner with more computational power (hashrate) mines a block at the same height, the first block could be invalidated. Bitcoin nodes always follow the chain with the highest cumulative work, meaning the chain with the most computational effort behind it. Each subsequent block added to the chain increases the work put into that chain, making it progressively harder to invalidate.

The Importance of Confirmation Time

The confirmation time for a Bitcoin transaction is crucial for ensuring its irreversibility. According to Jameson Lopp, a renowned Bitcoin contributor, the required confirmation time for a 99.9% certainty of irreversibility varies depending on the percentage of the network's hashrate controlled by a potential attacker. For instance, if an attacker controls 10% of the hashrate, five blocks (approximately 50 minutes) may be sufficient. However, if the attacker controls 45% of the hashrate, it could take up to 340 blocks (over 56 hours) to achieve the same level of certainty.

Current State of Bitcoin Mining

Luke Dash Jr.'s recommendation of a 12-block waiting period aligns with the current state of Bitcoin mining. Two major mining pools, Foundry USA and Antpool, control a significant portion of the global hashrate, with 29.67% and 22.75%, respectively. This concentration of mining power increases the risk of a 51% attack, where a single entity or group controls more than half of the network's hashrate, potentially allowing them to reverse transactions.

Mining Pool Concentration

The concentration of mining power in a few large pools makes the network more vulnerable to attacks. As of the last month, Foundry USA and Antpool together control over 50% of the total hashrate. This centralization poses a risk to the network's security and underscores the need for longer confirmation times to ensure transaction irreversibility.

Varying Confirmation Requirements

The recommended waiting time for Bitcoin transactions can vary depending on the state of the network and the risk tolerance of the receiving party. Some centralized exchanges may choose to wait for three blocks for smaller deposits, while others may require four, five, or even six blocks for larger amounts. Each block has an average interval of 10 minutes, so the total waiting time can range from 30 to 60 minutes or more.

Risk Tolerance and Transaction Size

The level of risk tolerance and the size of the transaction play a significant role in determining the required confirmation time. For high-value transactions, waiting for more confirmations reduces the risk of double-spending attacks. Conversely, for smaller transactions, fewer confirmations may be acceptable.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the traditional rule of thumb for Bitcoin transaction confirmation times ranges from three to six blocks, experts like Luke Dash Jr. recommend a more cautious approach of 12 blocks, or approximately 120 minutes. This recommendation takes into account the current state of Bitcoin mining and the concentration of hashrate in a few large pools. By understanding the probabilistic finality of Bitcoin transactions and the factors that influence confirmation times, users can make more informed decisions to ensure the security and irreversibility of their transactions.

Additional Considerations

As the Bitcoin network continues to evolve, it is essential to stay informed about changes in mining power distribution and network security. Users should regularly review best practices for transaction confirmation times and adjust their strategies accordingly. By doing so, they can minimize the risk of transaction reversals and ensure the integrity of their Bitcoin holdings.

Future Developments

Looking ahead, advancements in Bitcoin technology and potential changes in mining dynamics may impact recommended confirmation times. Innovations such as the Lightning Network aim to provide faster and more efficient transaction processing, potentially reducing the need for extended confirmation periods. However, until such solutions are widely adopted and proven secure, adhering to conservative confirmation practices remains prudent.

Final Thoughts

Ultimately, the safety of Bitcoin transactions depends on a combination of factors, including network hashrate distribution, transaction size, and individual risk tolerance. By understanding these elements and following expert recommendations, users can enhance the security of their Bitcoin transactions and contribute to the overall stability of the network.


Related Articles

Why is Bitcoin Up This Week?

Explore the factors driving Bitcoin's recent price surge and what it means for investors.

R. Kiyosaki Says Bitcoin is a Bargain Today, Not Tomorrow, as ‘America is Broke’

Discover why financial expert Robert Kiyosaki believes Bitcoin is a valuable investment in the current economic climate.

Bitcoin vs BTC Mining Stocks: Which Had Higher Weekly Gains?

Compare the performance of Bitcoin and BTC mining stocks to determine which investment offers better returns.

Top 10 Bitcoin Holders Globally in September 2023

Find out who the largest Bitcoin holders are and how their holdings impact the market.

Each Taxpayer Would Need to Pay 10 BTC to Get Even with the US National Debt

Understand the scale of the US national debt and its implications for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.


By incorporating these additional SEO keywords and related articles, this rewritten article aims to attract more user traffic from search engines while providing valuable insights into Bitcoin transaction confirmation times and network security.

Want to see why this token scored 0/100?